RSS Links
Subscribe to our site updates
Follow us on Twitter


Recent Comments
- Dave on Erotica Expo unlikely for Claudelands Arena – Hamilton
- Richard Hamilton on Art shock ‘kills’ PM [John Key] in alley – Sunday Star Times
- Silvio on What REALLY Happens During an Abortion
- Sarah on CEO of registered charity – Womens Refuge – criticises Judge’s decision
- Caleb on What REALLY Happens During an Abortion
- sylvia de freitas on John M Carr & more defunct NZ Petroleum Exploration Ltd Shareholders
- identity theft prote on Better Business Services, Inc. and Porn Marketing Connections ‘Down Under’
- john on Computer South Ltd finally Struck Off – Funnel for money laundering and fraud
- SPCS on Film “End of the Spear” R16 rating downgraded to R13 following Society’s successful appeal
- Elijah Winter on Film “End of the Spear” R16 rating downgraded to R13 following Society’s successful appeal
Categories
- Abortion (21)
- Alcohol abuse (2)
- Announcement (14)
- Anti-smacking Bill (25)
- Application For Leave (6)
- Broadcasting Standards Authority (11)
- Celebrating Christian Tradition (8)
- Censorship (56)
- Censorship & New Technology (22)
- Child Sex Crimes (10)
- Children's Television (9)
- Civil Unions (5)
- Complaints to Broadcasters (8)
- Computer games (11)
- Crime (76)
- Enforcement (1)
- Families Commission (2)
- Family (27)
- Film & Lit Board Reviews (11)
- Film & Lit. Board Appointments (9)
- Film Ratings (6)
- Films (13)
- HIV/AIDS STIs (2)
- Homosexuality (13)
- Human Dignity (20)
- Kinsey Fraud (1)
- Marriage (9)
- Moral Values (66)
- Newsletters (1)
- Porn Link to Rape (6)
- Pornography (103)
- Pro-life (21)
- Prostitution (14)
- Rape statistics (4)
- Recommended Books (12)
- Sex Studies (4)
- Sexual Dysfunction (22)
- Sexuality (3)
- Submissions (1)
- Television Violence (5)
- Uncategorized (152)
- Violence (29)
- Youth Crime (10)
- YouTube (4)
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
Family Values & Community Standards
Internet Safety
Pro-Life Groups


Storm as lesbian couple sue over unwarranted twin
Australia (Reuters News Report)
A LESBIAN couple in Australia are suing their doctor after they had twin girls from an in-vitro fertilisation procedure when they wanted only one child.
The two women are seeking more than $400,000 (NZ$470,000) in damages to help pay for the cost of raising the second child, including private school fees.
They say they made it clear to their doctor that they wanted only one baby. The twins are now three years old.
The civil case, which is the first of its kind in Australia, has prompted intense debate about the value of children and role of parents.
“The litigation involving twins already three years old undermines the importance of parenthood,” conservative government senator Guy Barnett said yesterday.
“We seem more intent on preserving and pandering to the wishes of adults than we are in protecting the rights of children.”
He wants same-sex couples and unmarried women to be banned from access to publicly funded IVF services, sparking a new moral debate ahead of national elections, due any time.
The case is being heard in Canberra. Letters published in the Canberra Times newspaper have overwhelmingly criticised the legal action after the birth of two healthy children.
“The child’s identity is subsumed to the whim of the mother who has bought the sperm and paid the IVF clinic,” The Australian columnist Angela Shanahan wrote in her newspaper. “Ultimately the result is the child as product, robbed of its unique identity.”
The court has ordered the suppression of the two women’s identities.
They used donor sperm from a Danish doctor for the IVF treatment in 2003.
The court has been told that they signed a consent form to allow two embryos to be implanted, but that they specifically told their specialist they wanted only one embryo implanted.
The court was told the births had created considerable stress within the couple’s relationship.
However, lawyers for the doctor said almost every couple who had a child went through similar strain.
Source: The Dominion Post. 21/09/07, B3.