<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Community Standards Inc. | New Zealand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spcs.org.nz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz</link>
	<description>Society for the Promotion of Community Standards Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:12:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on John M Carr and the defunct Triton Energy Corporation shareholder by Aaron Schmiedel</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2010/john-m-carr-and-the-defunct-triton-energy-corporation-shareholder/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Schmiedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/2010/john-m-carr-and-the-defunct-triton-energy-corporation-shareholder/#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>Wow, Triton hasn&#039;t been around for years.  It was a great company, and I was proud to be a part of it!

The building at 6688 N. Central Expressway is still there, but the Triton logo has long disappeared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Triton hasn&#8217;t been around for years.  It was a great company, and I was proud to be a part of it!</p>
<p>The building at 6688 N. Central Expressway is still there, but the Triton logo has long disappeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixing Business with Porn and Charity: John M Carr and Steve Crow by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/mixing-business-with-porn-and-charity-john-m-carr-and-steve-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/mixing-business-with-porn-and-charity-john-m-carr-and-steve-crow/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>Mmmmmm, very interesting web you have uncovered here.  Has this been picked up by the media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmmm, very interesting web you have uncovered here.  Has this been picked up by the media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barnardos drop legal threat re Vote No CIR YouTube Video by ConstantNeophyte</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/barnardos-drop-legal-threat-re-vote-no-cir-youtube-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>ConstantNeophyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=452#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Propaganda machine is a go!

Although, it is good to see that YouTube has apparently grown a spine and stopped censoring everything whenever someone goes &quot;legal action&quot; on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Propaganda machine is a go!</p>
<p>Although, it is good to see that YouTube has apparently grown a spine and stopped censoring everything whenever someone goes &#8220;legal action&#8221; on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CIR critic&#8217;s forced sex-smacking argument fails by ConstantNeophyte</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/cir-critics-forced-sex-smacking-argument-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>ConstantNeophyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=448#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>&quot;In contrast the vast majority of people today ... do recognise that a smack ... may form part of GOOD parental discipline&quot;

Do you have any reliable statistics to back that up or are you just hoping that claims will be validated when the ballot results are in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In contrast the vast majority of people today &#8230; do recognise that a smack &#8230; may form part of GOOD parental discipline&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have any reliable statistics to back that up or are you just hoping that claims will be validated when the ballot results are in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green MP Sue Bradford’s Attack on Democracy by ConstantNeophyte</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/green-mp-sue-bradford%e2%80%99s-attack-on-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>ConstantNeophyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=440#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>&quot;Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?&quot;

You don&#039;t think that is a leading question? What, are you high?

The question assumes that smacking is part of good parental correction. Many people disagree with that. This question is designed so that answering yes means that you disagree with &quot;good&quot; parental correction. It is a slanted question, if you cannot see that then your prejudices have truly blinded you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t think that is a leading question? What, are you high?</p>
<p>The question assumes that smacking is part of good parental correction. Many people disagree with that. This question is designed so that answering yes means that you disagree with &#8220;good&#8221; parental correction. It is a slanted question, if you cannot see that then your prejudices have truly blinded you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortions Authorised on Mental Health Grounds a Farce – Dr Margaret Sparrow by ConstantNeophyte</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/abortions-authorised-on-mental-health-grounds-a-farce-%e2%80%93-dr-margaret-sparrow/comment-page-1/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>ConstantNeophyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=438#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>I agree. This ridiculous charade needs to end. The practice of aborting because of concern for the mental state of the mother is clearly being abused.

We need to update our abortion laws to reflect that NZ, as a society, is happy to have proper abortion based on choice rather than hide behind &quot;mental health concerns&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This ridiculous charade needs to end. The practice of aborting because of concern for the mental state of the mother is clearly being abused.</p>
<p>We need to update our abortion laws to reflect that NZ, as a society, is happy to have proper abortion based on choice rather than hide behind &#8220;mental health concerns&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Green MP Sue Bradford con the gullible into believing that her ‘anti-smacking’ legislation was needed to end Child Abuse? by ash</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/did-green-mp-sue-bradford-mp-conned-the-the-gullible-into-believing-that-her-%e2%80%98anti-smacking%e2%80%99-legislation-was-needed-end-child-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 05:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=413#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>OK- citing a disgusting case of child abuse to try and win back the &quot;right&quot; to beat your children. Makes [no] sense to me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK- citing a disgusting case of child abuse to try and win back the &#8220;right&#8221; to beat your children. Makes [no] sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Society&#8217;s 2009 Members&#8217; AGM by ConstantNeophyte</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/announcing-societys-2009-members-agm/comment-page-1/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>ConstantNeophyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=408#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sleaze Capital of the Universe&quot;

No, don&#039;t pad the blow, tell us what you really think of NZ&#039;s media culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sleaze Capital of the Universe&#8221;</p>
<p>No, don&#8217;t pad the blow, tell us what you really think of NZ&#8217;s media culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Society&#8217;s 2009 Members&#8217; AGM by ash</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2009/announcing-societys-2009-members-agm/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 04:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/?p=408#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sleaze capital of the universe?&quot; Get your heads out of the sand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sleaze capital of the universe?&#8221; Get your heads out of the sand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praise for Censor&#8217;s Ban on &#8220;Cradle of Filth&#8221; T-shirt by Bert</title>
		<link>http://www.spcs.org.nz/2008/praise-for-censors-ban-on-cradle-of-filth-t-shirt/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spcs.org.nz/2008/praise-for-censors-ban-on-cradle-of-filth-t-shirt/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>ARE YOU SERIOUS.... I mean its just a t-shirt, yeah its offensive, so what? why so much trouble for a shirt that is going to wear out... Fans are still going to wear it and look for it. I am catholic myself and huge fan, also I would love to have such piece of clothing on me. 

ps. just dont let little kids look at it nor wear it to church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARE YOU SERIOUS&#8230;. I mean its just a t-shirt, yeah its offensive, so what? why so much trouble for a shirt that is going to wear out&#8230; Fans are still going to wear it and look for it. I am catholic myself and huge fan, also I would love to have such piece of clothing on me. </p>
<p>ps. just dont let little kids look at it nor wear it to church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
